Curioler — home

Fact checks

Claims you will actually run into — from clinics, from forums, from well-meaning relatives — checked against the evidence. Including the ones where the honest answer is that nobody knows yet.

1 result

  • CommunicationThis is misleadingTier 3 · Clinical consensus

    “we should not use "no" while training kids with ASD”

    There's no evidence the word "no" itself harms autistic children, and behavioral-therapy guidance actually recommends teaching kids to tolerate hearing it, since refusal is unavoidable in daily life. The real evidence-based practice is using clear, positive, directive phrasing ("walk please" instead of "don't run"), because negated instructions can be harder to process -- a narrower point than banning the word outright.

    1 September 2026 · 4 readsSee verdict →