Curioler — home
Sensory
Tier 2 · Research evidence

Why this tier: Randomized Controlled Trial

Ramma Inam, Saleh Shah, Muhammad Sana Ullah, Tahreem Tariq, Hira Ashraf (2026) Effects of Ayres sensory integration therapy versus conservative treatment in autism spectrum disorder. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association doi:10.47391/JPMA.21549
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Ayres sensory integration therapy versus conservative treatment in autism spectrum disorder.

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association · 2026 · PMID 42363339 · 2 min read

Easy explainer

This was a randomised controlled trial — people were assigned to treatments by chance, which is the most reliable way to tell whether a treatment itself caused a change.

It involved 30 people — a modest group, enough to be interesting but not enough to settle a question on its own.

The abstract does not include a conclusions section, so this page does not state what the researchers concluded.

This record does not state:

  • how long the study ran

This is a plain-language summary of one paper's abstract, not medical advice. Talk to your child's clinician before changing anything.

Study details

Journal: JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

Year: 2026

Design: Randomized Controlled Trial

Participants: 30

Age range: 2-8 years

Intervention: Ayres sensory integration

Authors: Ramma Inam, Saleh Shah, Muhammad Sana Ullah, Tahreem Tariq, Hira Ashraf

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of Ayres sensory integration therapy versus conservative treatment in autism spectrum disorder. In a prospective randomised controlled trial, we assessed pre- and post-intervention scores of both the intervention group (A) that took ASI and the control group (B) that received conservative treatment-only behaviour therapy, speech therapy, and educational activities of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) -using sensory profile from Jan 2024 to July 2024. Thirty diagnosed ASD cases, age range 2-8 years, were randomly enrolled in both groups (n=15/group) at the RICCER Institute of Faisalabad. The intervention group (A) was noted to be significantly better in mean change as compared with the control group (B). Independent and paired t-test results showed significant relationship between ASI intervention group (A) and sensory integration dysfunction, while non-significant relationship between sensory integration dysfunction and conservative group (B) treatment (p> 0.05). Ayres Sensory Integration, an Occupational Therapy Approach, was significantly effective in developing socialisation, self-care, and aim accomplishment in comparison to conservative treatment in ASD.

Source

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2026

PMID 42363339

DOI 10.47391/JPMA.21549

This record was extracted from the paper's PubMed abstract and metadata. Full-text methods and risk-of-bias details were not reviewed.

Source: Ramma Inam, Saleh Shah, Muhammad Sana Ullah, Tahreem Tariq, Hira Ashraf (2026) Effects of Ayres sensory integration therapy versus conservative treatment in autism spectrum disorder. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association doi:10.47391/JPMA.21549

This is informational content, not medical advice — see our disclaimer.